VISA DENIALS IN 2025–26: THE NEW PATTERNS NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT

If 2024 was characterized as the year of post-pandemic backlog clearance, 2025 and early 2026 have emerged as the era of precision adjudication. For many years, high-skilled immigration to the United States followed a predictable trajectory where approval was often anticipated as a matter of course provided the applicant satisfied basic criteria. That reality has shifted.

USCIS Immigration Form Review

As we settle into 2026, we are witnessing a quiet but drastic transformation in how U.S.Citizenship and Immigration Services evaluates petitions. The denial rates for 2025 did not merely rise; they changed in character. The issue is no longer simply about missing documentation or administrative errors but rather evidentiary weight and specific regulatory interpretation regarding the quality of the evidence submitted.

For entrepreneurs and advanced degree professionals utilizing the EB-2 National Interest Waiver, the landscape has become particularly challenging. Recent data indicate a sharp increase in denials, with approval rates in certain quarters dropping significantly from historical highs. The primary driver of this trend is a reinterpretation of the second prong of the specific legal framework governing these waivers.

In the current adjudication climate, general economic benefit is often deemed insufficient Adjudicators are routinely denying cases where the impact is geographically limited, such as a local restaurant chain, a boutique consultancy, or a general medical practice. The argument that a business will create jobs or generate revenue is no longer enough. USCIS now demands a clear nexus between the specific endeavor and urgent federal priorities, specifically:

Multinational executives transferring under the L-1A visa are facing a similar surge in scrutiny, specifically those designated as Functional Managers. These are leaders who manage an essential function rather than a large staff. Adjudicators are piercing the corporate veil to analyze daily activities with increased rigor. The most common reason for denial in this category is the determination that the applicant is an employee performing the essential function rather than managing it.

If the adjudicator suspects the executive is performing the actual work, such as writing code or making sales calls, the petition is denied. In the current landscape, the burden of proof to demonstrate a supporting tier of staff or contractors has increased dramatically. As detailed in the USCIS L-1A policy guidance, the agency expects to see an organizational structure that relieves the manager of non-managerial duties entirely.

Simultaneously, the L-1B visa for employees with specialized knowledge is seeing the definition of "specialized" interpreted with extreme strictness. The agency is revisiting the concept of proprietary knowledge and applying a rigorous test to determine if the knowledge is truly unique to the petitioning organization. Companies often argue that an employee is skilled or familiar with the company culture, but this is no longer sufficient.

Adjudicators are denying petitions where the knowledge can be gained by a general industry worker in a short timeframe. To succeed now, the petitioner must prove the knowledge is proprietary to the organization and cannot be easily transferred to a U.S. worker without significant economic cost.

For artists and creatives utilizing the O-1B visa, the dominance of digital media has complicated the definition of extraordinary ability. Adjudicators are struggling to distinguish between fleeting internet fame and true industry distinction. This has led to a new wave of denials based on the "sustained" aspect of the acclaim.

Viral success is not equivalent to sustained national or international acclaim. Applicants are frequently submitting evidence of a single viral moment as proof of extraordinary ability, but USCIS officers are differentiating between algorithm-driven visibility and peer-reviewed, industry-recognized distinction. Furthermore, generic press, including paid placements or press releases, is being flagged and disregarded more aggressively than in previous years.

Finally, a distinct trend of the current period is the rise of denials triggered by generic, template-heavy support letters. With the widespread availability of generative AI tools, many applicants are using these technologies to draft recommendation letters. This has led to a homogenization of evidence that USCIS is now actively targeting.

Adjudicators are identifying linguistic patterns that suggest evidence has been manufactured. When multiple support letters sound remarkably similar in tone and structure, it raises a red flag regarding the credibility of the evidence. A petition built on vague, flowery adjectives rather than hard metrics and specific project details is now a fast track to rejection.

Unilaw Global Services assists clients worldwide in preparing detailed, well-supported, and strategically structured petitions that meet the expectations of modern adjudications. Our approach focuses on clarity, precision, and the effective connection between evidence and regulatory standards. We ensure that the strengths of each case are presented in a manner that withstands heightened scrutiny and supports a favorable outcome. Please Contact us here to discuss your case strategy.

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Immigration laws and policies are subject to change. Please consult with a qualified attorney or immigration professional regarding your specific situation.